Want to learn more about your ATTUNE Knee?


Find an ATTUNE Knee Surgeon







Hear from more ATTUNE Knee patients


ATTUNE Knee Patient Stories



Since 2011, the ATTUNE® Knee System has been provided for more than 600,000 patients worldwide.3


In a clinical study, physical therapists noted that ATTUNE Knee patients had significantly greater range of motion compared to another leading knee replacement, both two and six weeks post-surgery.1


The ATTUNE Knee System has shown statistically significant improvements in patient recorded outcomes compared to certain leading brands.4


See how real ATTUNE Knee patients got back to doing what they love.

Rebecca - ATTUNE Knee patient video testimonial


Rebecca, loves gardening, her career as an interior designer, and most importantly her grandkids. Learn how she got back to being a full-time Grandma again.


Watch Rebecca's Full Story


Bob - ATTUNE Knee patient video testimonial


Bob is a 67-year-old handball player and a business owner. His knee pain was keeping him off the handball court.


Watch Bob's Full Story


Lani - ATTUNE Knee patient video testimonial


Lani is 57 and loves animals. She has turned that love into a career, but her real passion is horseback riding. Unfortunately, her knee pain was keeping her out of the saddle.


Watch Lani's Full Story

The ATTUNE® Knee System

Get back to doing what you love sooner.1,2


Designed By Experts, Based on Science

  • The ATTUNE® Knee to provide better range of motion and prevent the unstable feeling some patients experience during everyday activities, such as bending and walking up and down stairs.
  • Designed to work in harmony with your knee muscles and ligaments to increase stability and reduce pain, so that you can get back to living your life and pursuing your passions sooner.1,2
  • Backed by DePuy Synthes’ largest-ever research and development program, the ATTUNE Knee has been provided for more than 600,000 patients worldwide since its first clinical use in 2011.3



Read more



Find an ATTUNE® Knee Surgeon


Important Safety Information

As with any medical treatment, individual results may vary. The performance of knee replacements depends on your age, weight, activity level, and other factors. There are potential risks, and recovery takes time. People with conditions limiting rehabilitation should not have this surgery. Only an orthopaedic surgeon can determine if knee replacement is right for you.


1. Clatworthy, M. (2015). An Early Outcome Study of the ATTUNE® Knee System vs. the SIGMA® CR150 Knee System. DePuy Synthes Companies White Paper. DSUS/JRC/0814/0418 (1). In an IRB approved early outcomes study, physiotherapists collected data on 40 patients implanted with ATTUNE® Knees and 40 patients with SIGMA® CR150 knees. The results demonstrated that patients implanted with the ATTUNE Knee had statistically significant improvements in some early outcomes, other outcomes demonstrated a trend favoring the ATTUNE Knee, and some outcomes were equivalent. 2. Etter K, Lerner J, Kalsekar I, de Moor C, Yoo A, Swank M. Comparative Analysis of Hospital Length of Stay and Discharge Status of Two Contemporary Primary Total Knee Systems. J Knee Surg. 2017. 1(212): 1-10. DOI https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604442. Premier Perspective™ Database analysis including 38 hospitals, representing 1,178 primary, unilateral TKAs with the ATTUNE Knee and 5,707 primary, unilateral TKAs with Triathlon™. 3. DePuy Synthes Sales Data. February 2018. 4. Hamilton W.G., Brenkel, I., Clatworthy, M., Dwyer, K., Himden, S., Lesko, J., Kantor, S.: Early Outcomes with a New Primary TKA System vs. Contemporary TKA: Interim Results of Two Worldwide, Multi-Center Prospective Studies. AAOS, San Diego, California, March 14-18, 2017 Poster #106. Other implants tested: SIGMA Knee (DePuy), NexGen® (Zimmer), Triathlon® (Stryker). 5. Toomey, S.D.,Shah, J., Himden, S., Lesko, J., Hamilton W.G.: Comparative Incidence of Patellofemoral Complications Between Two Total Knee Arthroplasty Systems in a Multi-Center, Prospective Clinical Study. J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32:S187-S192. Implants tested: P.F.C. SIGMA (DePuy). 6. Indelli P.F., Pipino G., Johnson P., Grace_a A., Marcucci M., Posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of a classic and its evolutional design. Arthroplasty Today 2016;2:193-8. Implants tested: P.F.C. SIGMA and ATTUNE Knee. 7. Martin J.R., Jennings J.M., Watters T.S., Levy D.L., McNabb D.C., Dennis D.A., Femoral Implant Design Modi_cation Decreases the Incidence of Patellar Crepitus in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2017 Apr;32(4):1310-1313. Implants tested: P.F.C. SIGMA and ATTUNE Knee. 8. Ranawat C.S., White P.B., West S., Ranawat A.S., Clinical and Radiographic Results of Attune and PFC Sigma Knee Designs at 2-Year Follow-Up: A Prospective Matched-Pair Analysis. J Arthroplasty 2017;32:431-6. Implants tested: P.F.C. SIGMA and ATTUNE Knee 9. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report. (2017). Tables KT7, KT22, KT 23. Full summary of all data is available from: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2017. See Figure 9a. 10. National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man, 14th Annual Report. (2017). Table 3.29. Full summary of all data is available from: www.njrreports.org.uk.

Figure 9a:

Cumulative Percent Revision of Primary Total Knee Replacement with Cemented Fixation